Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 419705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T18:48:14+00:00 2026-05-12T18:48:14+00:00

I understand that sizeof is an operator, which is evaluated at compile time to

  • 0

I understand that sizeof is an operator, which is evaluated at compile time to an integer constant.
But it seem it can not be used in the #if preprocessor directive like:

#if 4 == sizeof(int)
    typedef int Int32;
#endif

(cygwin-gcc 3.4.4 as well as Visual C++ 6.0 report compile errors)

Why is such usage not allowed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T18:48:15+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:48 pm

    Because sizeof is evaluated at compilation time while directives are evaluated before compilation, and the part that does that is not the compiler, so it won’t understand what sizeof means.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that the elements of a python set are not ordered. Calling the
I understand that they are both supposed to be small, but what are the
Possible Duplicate: Sizeof array passed as parameter Given the function below I understand that
I (think I) understand that you can only retrieve the size of an array
I'm trying to time and compare sorting algorithms. From what I understand: sizeof(int) is
I understand that the Diamond shaped inheritance causes ambiguity and it can be avoided
I wonder why this works strange. I understand that the difference is grouping, but
OK, I'm not entirely a newbie, but I cannot say I understand the following
I understand that if the gwt application needs to support multiple locale values, all
I understand that psycopg2 is more of a DB driver, and SQLAlchemy is an

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.