Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 231141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:54:30+00:00 2026-05-11T19:54:30+00:00

I usually always find it sufficient to use the concrete classes for the interfaces

  • 0

I usually always find it sufficient to use the concrete classes for the interfaces listed in the title. Usually when I use other types (such as LinkedList or TreeSet), the reason is for functionality and not performance – for example, a LinkedList for a queue.

I do sometimes construct ArrayList with an initial capcacity more than the default of 10 and a HashMap with more than the default buckets of 16, but I usually (especially for business CRUD) never see myself thinking “hmmm…should I use a LinkedList instead ArrayList if I am just going to insert and iterate through the whole List?”

I am just wondering what everyone else here uses (and why) and what type of applications they develop.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:54:30+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:54 pm

    Those are definitely my default, although often a LinkedList would in fact be the better choice for lists, as the vast majority of lists seem to just iterate in order, or get converted to an array via Arrays.asList anyway.

    But in terms of keeping consistent maintainable code, it makes sense to standardize on those and use alternatives for a reason, that way when someone reads the code and sees an alternative, they immediately start thinking that the code is doing something special.

    I always type the parameters and variables as Collection, Map and List unless I have a special reason to refer to the sub type, that way switching is one line of code when you need it.

    I could see explicitly requiring an ArrayList sometimes if you need the random access, but in practice that really doesn’t happen.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself casting return types alot to silence compiler warnings and it always
I don't use DataSets much. Usually find myself using an ORM or just a
Usually (if not always), when jQuery allows you to add a callback to some
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. Usually there's always a million library
In my applications I always end up implementing a Model-View-Presenter pattern and usually end
My interface declarations usually (always?) follow the same scheme. Here's an example: class Output
When a TAction event fires, the Sender is always the action itself. Usually that's
I find myself often needing to use Integer.TryParse to test if a value is
Are IDEs always a Good Thing(tm)? I used to use only jEdit, but a
I've searched in here and other forums and couldn't find a good answer.. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.