Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 90391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:51:57+00:00 2026-05-10T22:51:57+00:00

I want to keep the class simple and not defined a constructor so i

  • 0

I want to keep the class simple and not defined a constructor so i can do Pt data = {0, 5}; so i figured the best way convert Pt_t from a short to long or vice versa is to do something like this.

template <class T> struct Pt_t {     T x, y;     template <class T2> operator Pt_t<T2>() { Pt_t pt = {x, y}; return pt; } }; 

The compiler doesnt like this and calls operator Pt_t on return pt; thus getting a stack overflow. How do i prevent this? the only solution i can think of is having Pt_t use constructors removing Pt_t pt = {1, 2}; which i prefer to keep if i can.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:51:58+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:51 pm

    I’m pretty sure the unqualified Pt_t in your functions body is Pt_t<T>, but don’t you want it to be Pt_t<T2>? You’ll need to explicitly qualify it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that I've written a TypeConverter for. I want to keep
I want to keep SSH debug info separate (and logged) from other input. However,
I want to keep only numbers and remove all characters from a variable. For
So as the title says i want to prevent user from keep submiting $_POST
I want a simple class that implements a fixed-size circular buffer . It should
i want to create some simple wrapper classes for an existing class library. To
This is pretty simple and straightforward. I want to throw a 503 error from
I'm writing a semi-simple database wrapper class and want to have a fetching method
I want to keep logs of some things that people do in my app,
I want to keep my website/s in version control (Subversion specifically) and use svn

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.