Home/ Questions/Q 680853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-14T01:25:04+00:00

I was just reading this article and it mentions that some organization had an

  • 0

I was just reading this article and it mentions that some organization had an Ontology as(?) their database(?) layer, and that the decision to do this was bad. Problem is I hadn’t heard about this before, so I can’t understand why it’s bad.

So I tried googling about databases and ontology, and came about quite a few pdfs from 2006 that we’re full of incomprehensible content (for my mind). I read a few of these and at this point still have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.

My current impression is that it was some crazy fad of 2006 that some academics were trying to sell us, but failed miserably due to the wording of their ideas. But I’m still curious if anyone actually knows what this is actually all about.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Karussell already provided the wikipedia definition:

    “a formal representation of the
    knowledge by a set of concepts within
    a domain and the relationships between
    those concepts”.

    In order to implement such a representation, several languages have been developed. The one that currently gets the most attention is probably the Web Ontology Language (OWL).

    In a traditional relational database, concepts can be stored using tables, but the system does not contain any information about what the concepts mean and how they relate to each other. Ontologies do provide the means to store such information, which allows for a much richer way to store information. This also means that one can construct fairly advanced and intelligent queries. Query languages such as SPARQL have been developed specifically for this purpose.

    For my masters thesis, I have worked with OWL ontologies, but this was as part of a fairly academic research. I don’t know if any of this technology is currently used in practice very much, but I’m sure the potential is there.

    Update: example

    An example of ‘meaning’ and reasoning over the ontologies: say you define in your ontology a class Pizza, and a class Vegetarian Pizza, which is a Pizza that has no Ingredients that belong to the class Meat. If you now create some instance of a Pizza that just happens not to have any meat ingredients, the system can automatically infer that your pizza is also a Vegetarian Pizza, even if you did not explicitly specify it.

    • 0