Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4547682
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T16:07:31+00:00 2026-05-21T16:07:31+00:00

I was recently going through some code and considering whether I need to be

  • 0

I was recently going through some code and considering whether I need to be careful with the expressions placed inside Debug.Assert statements, such as expensive operations or those with side effects. However, it appears the compiler is pretty smart about completely removing the Assert statement and inner expressions.

For example, the following will only print on debug builds:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    Debug.Assert(SideEffect());
}
private static bool SideEffect()
{
    Console.WriteLine("Side effect!");
    return true;
}

And this will complain that o is being used before initialization on release builds:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    object o;
    Debug.Assert(Initialize(out o));
    o.ToString();
}
private static bool Initialize(out object o)
{
    o = new object();
    return true;
}

It even seems to stand up to expressions such as this (printing “After” in both cases):

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    if (false) Debug.Assert(true);
    Console.WriteLine("After");
}

I was a little suprised with how smart the compiler is here and its ability to correctly detect cases when the Debug.Assert is removed. So, it got me curious..

  • How exactly is the statement removed? The expression tree must be built before the statement is removed in order to properly execute the above if statement correctly.
  • Is the System.Diagnostics.Debug class special here, or is it possible to build your own methods with similar handling?
  • Are there any ways to “trick” the preprocessor here? Even better, are there situations that one might encounter in real-world code where this could be problematic?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T16:07:31+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 4:07 pm

    Debug.Assert is declared with ConditionalAttribute; as the documentation states, this “[i]ndicates to compilers that a method call or attribute should be ignored unless a specified conditional compilation symbol is defined.”

    The C# compiler has specific support for that attribute and removes the Debug.Assert during release builds, so it is never part of the built expression tree.

    If you right-click on one of your Debug.Assert statements, you should be able to go to the definition. Visual Studio will show you “code” generated from the metadata, and there you can see the [Conditional("DEBUG")] attribute applied. So this code is only respected when DEBUG is #define‘d as part of your build.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have recently been going through some of our windows python 2.4 code and
I was going through some of the code for Dolphin CMS recently (a craptastic
I recently was given some code in c# ASP.NET and I was going through
Recently I was going through a blog and noticed some points about using PDO
I recently started picking up vi , going through some tutorials and trying to
I'm relatively new to cross-platform mobile development, and recently have been going through some
Recently, I have been going through search trees and I encountered red-black trees, the
Recently we are going to develop some products on mobile phone (specially for 3g).
E-Texteditor recently announced going open-source with their open company model. However after reading through
I was working on some code recently and decided to work on my operator

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.