Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6983591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:26:23+00:00 2026-05-27T18:26:23+00:00

I would like to do something like join with an Array , but instead

  • 0

I would like to do something like join with an Array, but instead of getting the result as a String, I would like to get an Array. I will call this interpolate. For example, given:

a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

I expect:

a.interpolate(0) # => [1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, 5]  
a.interpolate{Array.new} # => [1, [], 2, [], 3, [], 4, [], 5]

What is the best way to get this? The reason I need it to take a block is because when I use it with a block, I want different instances for each interpolator that comes in between.


After getting great answers from many, I came up with some modified ones.

This one is a modification from tokland’s answer. I made it accept nil for conj1. And also moved if conj2 condition to outside of the flat_map loop to make it faster.

class Array
    def interpolate conj1 = nil, &conj2
        return [] if empty?
        if conj2 then first(length - 1).flat_map{|e| [e, conj2.call]}
        else          first(length - 1).flat_map{|e| [e, conj1]}
        end << last
    end
end

This one is a modification of Victor Moroz’s answer. I added the functionality to accept a block.

class Array
    def interpolate conj1 = nil, &conj2
        return [] if empty?
        first, *rest = self
        if conj2 then rest.inject([first]) {|a, e| a.push(conj2.call, e)}
        else          rest.inject([first]) {|a, e| a.push(conj1, e)}
        end
    end
end

After benchmark test, the second one looks faster. It seems that flat_map, although looking beautiful, is slow.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:26:23+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:26 pm

    Not really sure what you want to do with a block, but I would do it this way:

    class Array
      def interpolate(sep)
        h, *t = self
        t.empty? ? [h] : t.inject([h]) { |a, e| a.push(sep, e) }
      end
    end
    

    UPDATE:

    Benchmarks (array size = 100):

                user     system      total        real
    inject  0.730000   0.000000   0.730000 (  0.767565)
    zip     1.030000   0.000000   1.030000 (  1.034664)
    

    Actually I am a bit surprised, I thought zip would be faster.

    UPDATE2:

    zip is faster, flatten is not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to do something like the following but can't seem to get
This seems like something simple but I'm not able to get the syntax correct.
I would like to do something like this: a rotating cube on a form.
I would like to do something like this: container::iterator it = NULL; switch (
I would like something that I can use as follows var msg = new
Does anyone know of a good alternative to cron? I would like something that
I would like to use something like CLR Profiles on .Net 2.0 to see
I would like display something more meaningful that animated gif while users upload file
I would like to do something like <test:di id=someService /`> <% someService.methodCall(); %> where
I would like to do something like the following: def add(a, b): #some code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.