Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6781871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T16:40:30+00:00 2026-05-26T16:40:30+00:00

If I am using an int as the array size when declaring a new

  • 0

If I am using an int as the array size when declaring a new array lint complains. What is the correct way to resolve this:

I could statically cast int to unsigned but that looks a bit odd…

What is the best way to resolve this without changing the use of an array and the need for integer as size?

MapItemPtr* pMapItems = new MapItemPtr[ (unsigned int)iRecordCount ];

Could do:

MapItemPtr* pMapItems = new MapItemPtr[static_cast<unsigned int>( iRecordCount )];

Is this the correct way to resolve the lint error:
Line 3811 Error 737: Loss of sign in promotion from int to unsigned int

or is there a more elegant way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T16:40:30+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:40 pm

    Since iRecordCount is clearly intended to hold a nonnegative integer, why not just declare it as unsigned int in the first place?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am declaring an array using new int *a = NULL; a = new
I using this code to resize an array to new size: I want to
when declaring the two dimensional array int random[height][width]; and then using it in a
I'm using C++ and wondering if I can just send an entire int array
I need to convert a char array into int and float using C The
I want to convert an int to a byte[2] array using BCD. The int
I'm using int as an example, but this applies to any value type in
I always thought that when declaring an array in C++, the size has to
I can sort a int* array using stl, plain and simple like std::sort(myarray, myarray
I have an int array with some values inside it, and its size is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.