Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7635077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T07:20:59+00:00 2026-05-31T07:20:59+00:00

If I don’t close an open ResultSet in Derby and the connection is using

  • 0

If I don’t close an open ResultSet in Derby and the connection is using ResultSet.HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT for holdability, what happens if I call:

connection.commit();
connection.rollback();

Is there any risk to calling rollback() once I’ve explicitly committed the current transaction? I ask because I find I always have to call rollback() before I can close the connection or I get an exception:

java.sql.SQLException: Cannot close a connection while a transaction is still active.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T07:21:00+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:21 am

    It’s perfectly legal to call rollback() when you haven’t performed any changes to the database.

    In fact, I rollback() read-only transactions all the time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Don't know how to google for such, but is there a way to query
Don't overthink this - there's a very commonly used term and I ... have
Don't know a whole lot about streams. Why does the first version work using
Don't know why this is happening, but after submitting a form via JS (using
Don't ask why, but is there any way to suppress a failed linking error?
Don't know if it's I'm doing it wrong or if there's a bug (I
don't know if this is possible.. I'm using sqlite3 schema: CREATE TABLE docs (id
Don't think there's much to say, here's my code for (int i = 0;
Don't ask how I got there, but I was playing around with some masking,
Don't want to sort the entries. using this does not preserve the order as

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.