Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 51493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:45:32+00:00 2026-05-10T16:45:32+00:00

If I have an array of a fixed size depending on how it is

  • 0

If I have an array of a fixed size depending on how it is defined and used, I typically use one of two ways to reference it.

Array type 1: Since it is a fixed size based on a define, I just use that define in all my loops referencing it.

#define MAXPLAYERS 4  int playerscores[MAXPLAYERS];  for(i=0;i<MAXPLAYERS;++i) { .... do something with each player } 

Array type 2: Since this array can grow as items are added to it, I use the sizeof to count the number of entries in it. The size would be converted to a constant by the compiler so there shouldn’t be any runtime penalty to doing it this way.

typedef struct {     fields.... }MYSTRUCT_DEF;  MYSTRUCT_DEF mystruct[]={    {entry 1},    {entry 2},    {entry 3...n}    };   for(i=0;i<(sizeof(mystruct)/sizeof(MYSTRUCT_DEF));++i)  {  ..... do something with each entry  } 

Is there a more elegant solution to handling processing of arrays without going past the end or stopping too early. Thoughts? Comments?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:45:33+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    This will work for both of your cases, regardless of array element type:

    #define ARRAY_COUNT(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof((x)[0]))  ...  struct foo arr[100]; ...  for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_COUNT(arr); ++i) {     /* do stuff to arr[i] */ } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 282k
  • Answers 282k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer 1 Did the escape analysis show up as being enabled… May 13, 2026 at 4:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think you might want validates_associated(*attr_names) http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Validations/ClassMethods.html#M002171 "Validates whether the… May 13, 2026 at 4:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should probably create all your markers at an initial… May 13, 2026 at 4:05 pm

Related Questions

Hi all I am not sure how to approach this problem. I have a
I have developed an array based implementation of a hashTable with several stock names,
If I want to declare a vector of unknown size, then assign values to
There is a question I have been wondering about for ages and I was

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.