Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7408773
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T05:58:18+00:00 2026-05-29T05:58:18+00:00

If I have B extends A… and A implements Serializable, do I have to

  • 0

If I have B extends A… and A implements Serializable, do I have to write “B implements Serializable” ?

I think no, but I would like confirmation…

also if I put serialization id in A… do I need to put one in B also ? should serialization id in A be protected (not private) ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T05:58:19+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 5:58 am

    Yes. Subclass need not be marked serializable explicitly.

    And, marking id as protected will do (from compiler perspective).

    But, as good practice every class should have it’s own private serialVersionUID.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have: class MyClass extends MyClass2 implements Serializable { //... } In MyClass2 is
I have a class which implements Serializable. Now I extends this class and I
I would like to create a UserControl that will have some behavior(animated collapsing...) and
I have controller which extends Controller_Template , and also i have quite few functions
I have my UserBundle who extends the FOSUserBundle and works fine. But now, I
I have a two layouts files in my app. Also I have Activity extends
I have a class that extends View. I override the onDraw method and allow
I have a class that extends android.app.Dialog, the layout is done in an xml
I have some classes which extends a superclass, and in the JSP I want
i have a class that extends another. when i iterate the current object i

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.