Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8372027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T14:18:43+00:00 2026-06-09T14:18:43+00:00

If I understand correctly, when a shared_ptr (from boost, tr1, std, whatever) is initialised

  • 0

If I understand correctly, when a shared_ptr (from boost, tr1, std, whatever) is initialised with a pointer to a freshly-allocated object, the shared_ptr’s constructor allocates a small amount of memory to hold a reference count for the pointer it manages. What happens if that allocation fails? In the following code:

class my_class {};
void my_func(shared_ptr<my_class> arg);

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
    my_func(shared_ptr<my_class>(new my_class()));
    return 0;
}

…will the my_class object be leaked if the shared_ptr fails to allocate memory for its reference count? Or does shared_ptr’s constructor take responsibility for deleting the object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T14:18:45+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 2:18 pm

    Your code will not leak the my_class object, even if shared_ptr could not allocate memory.

    According to the C++11 standard (20.7.2.2.1), in the shared_ptr constructor:

    Throws: bad_alloc, or an implementation-defined exception when a resource other than memory
    could not be obtained.

    Exception safety: If an exception is thrown, delete p is called.

    In the constructor version that takes a user-defined deleter, the deleter will be used instead.

    Boost documentation specifies the same.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If I understand correctly, in .NET the default implementation of Object.GetHashCode() returns a value
really can't understand, how to build correctly project that uses boost.python. I've included boost_(python/thread/system)-mt.
I am currently reading through C++ TR1 extensions and started focussing on std::tr1::shared_ptr. So,
Do I understand correctly that CCLabelBMFont only loads the font texture once, no matter
This is just a quick question to understand correctly what happens when you create
If I understand it correctly this means extern void foo(); that the function foo
If I understand this correctly, the program counter points to the address of the
Been trying my best to understand this correctly. What is the difference between an
Why does this not work? Do I not understand delegate covariance correctly? public delegate
I am not sure if I understand the usage of crossdomain.xml correctly. I am,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.