Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If my application is out of memory when i call new() i will get exception and malloc() i will get 0 pointer.
But what if i call a method with some local variables? They occupy memory too. Is there some way to reserve memory for “normal” variables? So that even though new() throws exception i can just catch it, fix stuff and still call methods like usual.
The compiler knows how much of memory per stack you need. However, sufficiently high number of stacks (caused due to recursion) will crash your program — there probably isn’t another way to fix this.
The standard has an interesting annexure called Implementation Quantities. This is non-normative (informative) and hence should not be treated as the absolute truth, but provides you with a fair idea.