Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 230837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:52:58+00:00 2026-05-11T19:52:58+00:00

I’m currently maintaining a legacy Visual Basic project that has these procErr: statements all

  • 0

I’m currently maintaining a legacy Visual Basic project that has these “procErr:” statements all over the place. My guess is, that they are used as a way to handle if any error occurred while executing the function, is this correct?

I’ve converted the project to VB.NET. Would a better way not be, instead of using this procErr syntax, to wrap it inside a Try Catch instead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:52:59+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:52 pm

    My VB is a bit rusty, but I believe ‘ProcErr’ is not a reserved keyword. It is just a naming convention in VB to indicate the block that should be executed when an error occurs in your method (or ‘procedure’, hence the name).

    In the actual code, you then have statements like On Error GoTo ProcErr and then you define the procerr block:

    procErr:
    msgbox "an error has happened"
    

    You could replace this with any other name.
    In VB.NET you would indeed replace this with a try catch routine:

    Try
    // code
    Catch x As Type
    // exceoption handling
    Finally
    End Try 'cleanup code
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 163k
  • Answers 163k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you compiling for OS 3? I don't believe UITableViewCellStyleValue1… May 12, 2026 at 12:07 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Since the parameters to Buffer.BlockCopy are byte-based rather than index-based,… May 12, 2026 at 12:07 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If auto commit is turned off by default you won't… May 12, 2026 at 12:07 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.