Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 521313
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:14:14+00:00 2026-05-13T08:14:14+00:00

I’m generating an interface to concrete implementation copier. A later step will be to

  • 0

I’m generating an interface to concrete implementation copier. A later step will be to determine if I can easily add varying behaviors depending on the copy type requested (straight copy, or try, or try-catch-addToValidationDictionary). This is the main one I need/am working on is the try-catch-addToValidationDictionary. It would be lovely if the copy statements themselves(result.AssetTag = asset.AssetTag) were reusable in list form for another consumer that doesn’t need the try/catch/validation functionality.

The General form is this:

public static AssetService
{
public static ModelAsset CreateAssetDomain(IAmAnAsset asset, IValidationDictionary validationDictionary)
 {

 var result=new ModelAsset();
 var hasExceptions=false;
  try
        {
            result.AssetTag = asset.AssetTag;
        }
        catch (System.Exception exception)
        {
            validationDictionary.AddError(Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(lIAmAnAsset => lIAmAnAsset.AssetTag), exception.Message);
            hasExceptions = true;
        }
 try
        {
            result.LocationIdentifer = asset.LocationIdentifer;
        }
        catch (System.Exception exception)
        {
            validationDictionary.AddError(Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(lIAmAnAsset => lIAmAnAsset.LocationIdentifer), exception.Message);
            hasExceptions = true;
        }
  ...
  if (hasExceptions)
    throw new ArgumentException("Failed validation");

 return result;
 }
}

I’m trying to factor out some of the repetition with lambdas but the Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(lIAmAnAsset => lIAmAnAsset.AssetTag) from this post seems to only take an Expression<Func<T,object>> and I’m not sure how you would make use of the Expression> overload.

One attempt was as follows:

 Action<Action, Expression<Func<IAmAnAsset, object>>> CopyActions = (copyAction, expression) =>
            {
                try
                {
                    copyAction();
                }
                catch (Exception exception)
                {

                    validationDictionary.AddError(Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(expression), exception.Message);
                    hasExceptions = true;
                }
            };

  var copyActions = new Dictionary<string,Action>()
    {
    Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(z=>z.AddedBy),()=>result.AddedBy=asset.AddedBy},
    Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(z=>z.AssetTag),()=>result.AssetTag=asset.AssetTag},
    ...
    }
 foreach (var item in copyActions)
        {
            tryCopyAction(item.Value, item.Key);
        }
 if (hasExceptions)
throw new ArgumentException("Failed validation");

 return result;

I’m hoping for a solution that reduces the duplication inherent in
Member.Name<IAmAnAsset>(z=>z.AddedBy),()=>result.AddedBy=asset.AddedBy},
on any of the following criteria:

  • needing the IAmAnAsset.AddedBy in 2 places on each line
  • needing .AddedBy 3 times on the same line
  • Member.Name<IAmAnAsset> on each and every line
    • Is it possible to have this Expression utilized to retrieve either the string name, or the value of evaluating it?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:14:15+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:14 am

    How about a simple function?

    public static class Member
    {
      private static string GetMemberName(Expression expression)
      {
        switch (expression.NodeType)
        {
          case ExpressionType.MemberAccess: var memberExpression = (MemberExpression)expression; var supername = GetMemberName(memberExpression.Expression); if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(supername)) return memberExpression.Member.Name; return String.Concat(supername, '.', memberExpression.Member.Name);
          case ExpressionType.Call: var callExpression = (MethodCallExpression)expression; return callExpression.Method.Name;
          case ExpressionType.Convert: var unaryExpression = (UnaryExpression)expression; return GetMemberName(unaryExpression.Operand);
          case ExpressionType.Parameter: return String.Empty;
          default: throw new ArgumentException("The expression is not a member access or method call expression");
        }
      }
      public static string Name<T,V>(Expression<Func<T, V>> expression)
      {
        return GetMemberName(expression.Body);
      }
      public static string Name<T>(Expression<Action<T>> expression)
      {
        return GetMemberName(expression.Body);
      }
    }
    
    void Copy<D, S, V>(D dest, S source, Expression<Func<S, V>> getVal, Action<D, V> setVal, IDictionary validationDictionary)
    {
      Func<S, V> doGetVal = getVal.Compile();
      try { setVal(dest, (V)doGetVal(source)); }
      catch (System.Exception exception)
      {
        validationDictionary.Add(Member.Name<S,V>(getVal), exception.Message);
      }
    }
    
    class TestAsset { public string AssetTag { get; set; } public string LocationIdentifier { get; set; } }
    TestAsset Test()
    {
      Dictionary<string, string> validationDictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>();
      var result = new TestAsset{ AssetTag = "a", LocationIdentifier = "b" };
      var asset = new TestAsset{ AssetTag = "A", LocationIdentifier = "B" };
      var validationCount = validationDictionary.Count(); 
      Copy(result, asset, x => asset.AssetTag, (x, v) => x.AssetTag = v, validationDictionary); 
      Copy(result, asset, x => asset.LocationIdentifier, (x, v) => x.LocationIdentifier = v, validationDictionary); 
      if (validationCount < validationDictionary.Count) throw new ArgumentException("Failed validation"); 
      return result;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 419k
  • Answers 419k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The reason that regenerating sessions is seen as good, is… May 15, 2026 at 10:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Make them both float left, you could also try putting… May 15, 2026 at 10:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I've always done this by using default values and conditions;… May 15, 2026 at 10:13 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.