I’m trying to understand what the best practice is and why for concatenating string literals and variables for different cases. For instance, if I have code like this
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("AAAAAAAAAAAAA")
.append(B_String).append("CCCCCCCCCCC").append(D_String)
.append("EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE")
.append("FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF");
Is this the way to do it? From this post, I noticed that the + operator on Strings creates a new instance of StringBuilder, concatenates the operands, and returns a String conversion, which seems like a lot more work than just calling .append(); so if that’s true, then that is out of the question. But what about String.concat()? Is it proper to use .append() for every concatenation? Or just for variables, and literals are okay to append with .concat()?
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("AAAAAAAAAAAAA")
.append(B_String.concat("CCCCCCCCCCC")).append(D_String
.concat("EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE")
.concat("FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF"));
What are the general rules for best practices and performance for going about these situations? Is my assumption correct on + and it should really just not be used?
+operatorBehind the scenes this is translated to:
Imagine how much extra work it adds if you have
s1 + s2here:instead of:
Multiple strings with
+Worth to note that:
is translated to:
concat()Stringcreateschar[]array that can fit boths1ands2. Copiess1ands2contents to this new array. Actually requires less work then+operator.StringBuilder.append()Maintains an internal
char[]array that grows when needed. No extrachar[]is created if the internal one is sufficiently big.is also performing poorly because
s1.concat(s2)creates an extrachar[]array and copiess1ands2to it just to copy that new array contents to internalStringBuilderchar[].That being said you should use
append()all the time and append raw strings (your first code snippet is correct).