Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7826769
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T09:34:10+00:00 2026-06-02T09:34:10+00:00

In a recent Hacker Newsletter issue, this very useful article about decorators in Python

  • 0

In a recent Hacker Newsletter issue, this very useful article about decorators in Python was linked. I like the article and I think I understand most of the decorator examples. However, in the non-decorator memoization example, I’m very confused by the code:

def memoize(fn):
    stored_results = {}

    def memoized(*args):
        try:
            # try to get the cached result
            return stored_results[args]
        except KeyError:
            # nothing was cached for those args. let's fix that.
            result = stored_results[args] = fn(*args)
            return result

    return memoized

I’m confused about how this function would create a persisting dictionary stored_results that gets appended to. After re-reading it, copy/pasting it into my editor and playing with it, and looking online for help, I still don’t understand what the syntax stored_results[args] = fn(*args) is really doing.

(1) The article suggests that the above code will return the function, but that now it will search a dictionary first before executing on novel arguments. How does this happen? Why isn’t stored_results just local to memoize? Why doesn’t it get destroyed when memoized is returned?

(2) Links to other questions or web resources that explain the argument passing here with *args would be helpful too. If *args is a list of arguments, why can we use the syntax stored_results[args], when normally you get a non-hashable error when trying to index a dictionary on a list?

Thanks for any clarifying thoughts.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T09:34:11+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 9:34 am

    If *args is a list of arguments, why can we use the syntax stored_results[args], when normally you get a non-hashable error when trying to index a dictionary on a list?

    Because it’s not a list, it’s a tuple. Lists are mutable, so you can’t define a meaningful hash function on them. Tuples however are immutable data structures.

    Why isn’t stored_results just local to memoize? Why doesn’t it get destroyed when memoized is returned?

    Because memoize and memoized share the same name context (closure). The closure persists because memoized holds a reference to it and you return it and assign it to a global name (this is the effect of the decorator statement). With the closure, all the captured values persist as well.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The recent article of steve jobs link made me think about the future of
This recent question about sorting randomly using C# got me thinking about the way
This recent question had me thinking about optimizing a category filter. Suppose we wish
I recent wrote this post: How best to store VERY large 2D list of
Recent conversations with colleagues have produced varying points of view on this matter. What
A recent article on Ars Technica discusses a recent study performed by the Psychology
A recent question about string literals in .NET caught my eye. I know that
A recent question came up about using String.Format(). Part of my answer included a
A recent question about StyleCop alerted me to the use of tools to enforce
A recent article on HTML5 says, the Proposed Recommendation date is 2022 and the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.