Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1000349
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:29:56+00:00 2026-05-16T07:29:56+00:00

In binary search algorithm we have two comparisons: if (key == a[mid]) then found;

  • 0

In binary search algorithm we have two comparisons:

if (key == a[mid]) then found;

else if (key < a[mid]) then binary_search(a[],left,mid-1);
      else binary_search(a[],mid+1,right);

Is there a way by which I can have only one comparison instead of the above two.

—

Thanks

Alok.Kr.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:29:56+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:29 am

    See:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_algorithm#Single_comparison_per_iteration

    Taken from wiki:

       low = 0
       high = N
       while (low < high) {
           mid = low + ((high - low) / 2)
           if (A[mid] < value)
               low = mid + 1;
           else
                //can't be high = mid-1: here A[mid] >= value,
                //so high can't be < mid if A[mid] == value
                high = mid;
       }
       // high == low, using high or low depends on taste
       if ((low < N) && (A[low] == value))
           return low // found
       else
           return -1 // not found
    

    Pros/cons from wiki:
    “This approach foregoes the possibility of early termination on discovery of a match, thus successful searches have log2(N) iterations instead of an expected log2(N) − 1 iterations. On the other hand, this implementation makes fewer comparisons: log2(N) is less than the expected number of comparisons for the two-test implementations of 1·5(log2(N) − 1), for N greater than eight.”

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 539k
  • Answers 539k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Makes checking the passwords more difficult - not recommended. Better… May 17, 2026 at 2:10 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your "tags" objects seem off to me. The code: [{"globe","circle","round","world"}]… May 17, 2026 at 2:10 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Based on your comment that you don't want to attach… May 17, 2026 at 2:10 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have been implementing binary tree search algorithm recently in R, and before that
i have seen a few days ago such problem there is given two array
- This is my find() method using Binary Search algorithm: It works just as
Let's say I have two arrays: int ArrayA[] = {5, 17, 150, 230, 285};
Problem I have timestamped data, which I need to search based on the timestamp
I have a list of two-dimensional points and I want to obtain which of
We are given a binary search tree; we need to find out its border.
Given a binary search tree, i need to convert it into a doubly linked
I was searching through the possible work arounds for doing Binary search in Erlang
I have just solved problem23 in Project Euler, in which I need a set

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.