Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 162553
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:24:41+00:00 2026-05-11T11:24:41+00:00

In C++ templates, one can specify that a certain type parameter is a default.

  • 0

In C++ templates, one can specify that a certain type parameter is a default. I.e. unless explicitly specified, it will use type T.

Can this be done or approximated in C#?

I’m looking for something like:

public class MyTemplate<T1, T2=string> {} 

So that an instance of the type that doesn’t explicitly specify T2:

MyTemplate<int> t = new MyTemplate<int>(); 

Would be essentially:

MyTemplate<int, string> t = new MyTemplate<int, string>(); 

Ultimately I am looking at a case wherein there is a template that is fairly widely used, but I am considering expanding with an additional type parameter. I could subclass, I guess, but I was curious if there were other options in this vein.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:24:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:24 am

    Subclassing is the best option.

    I would subclass your main generic class:

    class BaseGeneric<T,U>

    with a specific class

    class MyGeneric<T> : BaseGeneric<T, string>

    This makes it easy to keep your logic in one place (the base class), but also easy to provide both usage options. Depending on the class, there is probably very little extra work needed to make this happen.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 139k
  • Answers 139k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The problem mysteriously disappeared after repeatedly deleting that folder, and… May 12, 2026 at 7:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could issue a: curl --head www.test.com that will print… May 12, 2026 at 7:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes: WURFL, the Wireless Universal Resource File: "The WURFL is… May 12, 2026 at 7:38 am

Related Questions

I've been talking with friends and some completely agree that templates in C++ should
I am creating a class library with many different options for possible customizations. For
I liked the discussion at Differences in Generics , and was wondering whether there
I'm trying to create am immutable type (class) in C++, I made it so

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.