Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1032635
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:06:30+00:00 2026-05-16T14:06:30+00:00

In C++11, is there a way to template a lambda function? Or is it

  • 0

In C++11, is there a way to template a lambda function? Or is it inherently too specific to be templated?

I understand that I can define a classic templated class/functor instead, but the question is more like: does the language allow templating lambda functions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:06:31+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:06 pm

    UPDATE 2018: C++20 will come with templated and conceptualized lambdas. The feature has already been integrated into the standard draft.


    UPDATE 2014: C++14 has been released this year and now provides Polymorphic lambdas with the same syntax as in this example. Some major compilers already implement it.


    At it stands (in C++11), sadly no. Polymorphic lambdas would be excellent in terms of flexibility and power.

    The original reason they ended up being monomorphic was because of concepts. Concepts made this code situation difficult:

    template <Constraint T>
    void foo(T x)
    {
        auto bar = [](auto x){}; // imaginary syntax
    }
    

    In a constrained template you can only call other constrained templates. (Otherwise the constraints couldn’t be checked.) Can foo invoke bar(x)? What constraints does the lambda have (the parameter for it is just a template, after all)?

    Concepts weren’t ready to tackle this sort of thing; it’d require more stuff like late_check (where the concept wasn’t checked until invoked) and stuff. Simpler was just to drop it all and stick to monomorphic lambdas.

    However, with the removal of concepts from C++0x, polymorphic lambdas become a simple proposition again. However, I can’t find any proposals for it. 🙁

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 536k
  • Answers 536k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Like this: var now = new Date(); now.setDate(now.getDate() + 1);… May 17, 2026 at 1:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Using Chrome I can see half of your first menu… May 17, 2026 at 1:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Must likely, you are over-releasing an object or releasing an… May 17, 2026 at 1:28 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I'm looking at boost::lambda as a way to to make a generic algorithm that
I'm not sure this is possible, but is there a way, using template programming
Is there way to call an XSL template with optional parameters? For example: <xsl:call-template
Given the following template: template<class T> class Container { private: boost::function<T> f; }; ...
Is there a better way of writing this code? It just doesn't sit right
I want to Constraint that the Derived Class must have a Default Constructor. I
As far as I understand, there is no serialization ( boost::serialization , actually) support
Is there any way of getting the full .NET type name when writing a
Is there any way to add custom attributes to properties in EF generated code?
Is there any way to make a single XSLT file to show an overview

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.