Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
in coffeescript the following code is all legal
foo(a:b, d)
foo({a:b}, d.x)
foo(a:b, (d.x))
But for some reason
foo(a:b, d.x)
is illegal. I figure this must either be because there is an ambiguity here I’m not seeing or the interpreter is being overly vigilant.
turns out this is a previously reported coffeescript bug