Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8536881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T10:46:08+00:00 2026-06-11T10:46:08+00:00

In doxygen is there any common way to specify that some C++ template parameters

  • 0

In doxygen is there any common way to specify that some C++ template parameters of function parameters are implementation details and should not be specified by the user ?

For example, a template parameter used as recursion level counter in metaprogramming technique or a SFINAE parameter in a function ?

For example :

/// \brief Do something
/// \tparam MyFlag A flag...
/// \tparam Limit Recursion limit
/// \tparam Current Recursion level counter. SHOULD NOT BE EXPLICITELY SPECIFIED !!!
template<bool MyFlag, unsigned int Limit, unsigned int Current = 0> myFunction();

Is there any doxygen normalized option equivalent to “SHOULD NOT BE EXPLICITELY SPECIFIED !!!” ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T10:46:09+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 10:46 am

    It seems to me that the whole template is an implementation detail of a different interface:

    template<bool MyFlag, unsigned int Limit, unsigned int Current = 0> myFunctionImpl();
    
    template<bool MyFlag, unsigned int Limit> myFunction() {
       myFunctionImpl<MyFlag, Limit, 0>();
    }
    

    Now it becomes easier to document: myFunction() (and all it’s arguments) are part of the interface, which does not include the iteration counter. myFunctionImpl() is the implementation of that interface and does not need to be documented at all (or only minimally with a comment stating that it is an implementation detail and user code should not depend on it or use it directly). If you want, you can enclose the implementation in an #ifdef block so that the doxygen preprocessor removes it and it does not appear in the generated documentation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way to configure Doxygen to include the log from SVN for
Are there any tools that can transform C++ code to xml, or some other
Is there a way to suppress Doxygen from giving not documented warnings on particular
Is there any way to reduce number of files generated by doxygen(may be by
Is there a tool that can generate diagrams (similar to Doxygen using Graphviz) but
I have a doxygen header for a function as follows: /** Some description. @param[in]
Is there a way to create a class diagram without using doxygen?
How should I document a function object (AKA functor) with doxygen? It feels misleading
Is there a convenient way to document a C++ concept in doxygen? I would
I have another Doxygen question. Is there a way to keep multiple arguments of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.