Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6161923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T21:33:46+00:00 2026-05-23T21:33:46+00:00

In Java we implement an interface Serializable that defines no method (also called a

  • 0

In Java we implement an interface Serializable that defines no method (also called a marker interface).

But suppose I have an interface without any method just like a Serializable interface, can I make it work just like that, meaning that I would be able to use my interface instead of the Serializable?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T21:33:47+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    Only Serializable will mark an object as being compatible with Java’s built-in serialization machinery.

    You can create other empty interfaces, but they won’t mean the same thing. Each interface is distinct, even if it defines the same set of methods.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two Java class hierarchies that share a common ancestor and implement a
I would like to implement a command line interface for a Java application. This
An enum in Java implements the Comparable interface. It would have been nice to
In general, is it a best practice to have simple POJO Java classes implement
I'd like to implement a simple class (in Java) that would allow me to
I want to implement an aplication where I have various Objects that can be
In java I can implement the composite design pattern as follows: interface Component{ void
I'm using the Observable class / Observer interface in Java to implement the observer
How does one make a method in an interface that's not abstract? I know
In Java 1.4.2 , class java.math.BigInteger implements interfaces Comparable , Serializable . In Java

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.