Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6161923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T21:33:46+00:00 2026-05-23T21:33:46+00:00

In Java we implement an interface Serializable that defines no method (also called a

  • 0

In Java we implement an interface Serializable that defines no method (also called a marker interface).

But suppose I have an interface without any method just like a Serializable interface, can I make it work just like that, meaning that I would be able to use my interface instead of the Serializable?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T21:33:47+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    Only Serializable will mark an object as being compatible with Java’s built-in serialization machinery.

    You can create other empty interfaces, but they won’t mean the same thing. Each interface is distinct, even if it defines the same set of methods.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class that implements java.io.Serializable interface.So all the variables in that class
If a Java class implements the Serializable interface but does not have a public
Is it necessary that a Java Bean implements the Serializable interface?
Although the java.io.Serializable interface public interface Serializable{} surprisingly doesn't contain any methods and fields
Suppose I have a Java inteface public interface Bar { public void baz(String st)
When i define a java object to implement serializable interface, do the members of
I would like to implement a command line interface for a Java application. This
I am trying to implement a Stack in java (using the list interface: Interface
An enum in Java implements the Comparable interface. It would have been nice to
Is there any other way in java to implement call backs apart from inner

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.