Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6017463
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T03:07:55+00:00 2026-05-23T03:07:55+00:00

In Linux, with POSIX threads, is it possible to hint the scheduler to schedule

  • 0

In Linux, with POSIX threads, is it possible to hint the scheduler to schedule a particular thread. Actually the scenario is that I have a process which is replica of another process. For deterministic execution, the follower process needs to acquire the locks in the same order as the leader process.

So for example, say in leader process, mutex a is locked by first thread 2, then 3 and 4. The follower must execute in the same order. So if in follower, thread 3 first encounters mutex a, I want thread 3 to say to the scheduler, ok I’m giving up my time slice, please schedule thread 2 instead. I know this can be achieved by modifying the scheduler, but I do not want that, I want to be able to control this from user space program.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T03:07:56+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:07 am

    In any system, Linux, Windows POSIX or not, if you have to ask this sort of question then I’m afraid that your app is heading for a dark place 🙁

    Even if thread 3 were to yield, say with sleep(0), an interrupt straight after might well just schedule thread 3 back on again, preempting thread 2, or the OS might run thread 3 straightaway on another free core and it could get to the mutex first.

    You have to make your app work correctly, (maybee not optimally), independently of the OS scheduling/dispatching algorithms. Even if you get your design to work on a test box, you will end up having to test your system on every combination of OS/hardware to ensure that it still works without deadlocking or performing incorrectly.

    Fiddling with scheduling algorithms, thread priorities etc. should only be done to improve the performance of your app, not to try and make it work correctly or to stop it locking up!

    Rgds,
    Martin

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a process that must create and close threads on demand. Each thread
I have two Slackware Linux systems on which the POSIX semaphore sem_open() call fails
On linux, it's possible to create a tun interface using a tun driver which
So I've noticed that the default stack size for threads on linux is 8MB
Greeting !! I've a c ap running in linux which is a POSIX multithreading
How to implement posix threads in linux c++.The smme program when saved as .c
I tend to use POSIX Threads , when programming in C, under Linux .
I've just started programming with POSIX threads on dual-core x86_64 Linux system. It seems
What are all the possible thread states during execution for native (C/C++) threads on
I am looking for the R equivalent of linux/POSIX exit(n) which will halt the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.