Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6050473
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:41:31+00:00 2026-05-23T07:41:31+00:00

In the below example, new Thread() doesnt have any reference. Is it possible that

  • 0

In the below example, new Thread() doesnt have any reference. Is it possible that it be garbage collected below it is dead ?
Also without extending Thread class or implementing runnable, how are we creating a thread ?

public class TestFive {
    private int x;
    public void foo() {
            int current = x;
            x = current + 1;
    }
    public void go() {
            for(int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
                    new Thread() {
                            public void run() {
                                    foo();
                                    System.out.print(x + ", ");
                            } 
                    }.start();
            } 
    }
    public static void main(String args[]){
            TestFive bb = new TestFive();
            bb.go();
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:41:32+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:41 am

    A new thread that has not been started will be garbage collected when it becomes unreachable in the normal way.

    A new thread that has been started becomes a garbage collection “root”. It won’t be garbage collected until (after) it finishes.

    In the below example, new Thread() doesnt have any reference. Is it possible that it be garbage collected below it is dead ?

    No. It has been started, and hence won’t be garbage collected until it finishes / dies. And it does have a reachable reference until (at least) the point at which the start() call returns.

    Also without extending Thread class or implementing runnable, how are we creating a thread?

    In your example, you have created anonymous subclass of Thread; i.e. a class that extends Thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to have the parent that spawned a new thread catch
In the example below I have a ListBox with dozens of font names in
How can I select the good method (I have in the example below show
The example below throws an InvalidOperationException, Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute.
In my example below I'm using a dijit.form.DateTextBox : <input type=text name=startDate dojoType=dijit.form.DateTextBox constraints={datePattern:'MM/dd/yyyy'}
I usually do something like the example below when I need to return error
I am working with an object which has sub objects within (see example below).
Working with a latex document with eps images as in the example below... \documentclass[11pt]{paper}
I'm trying to perform a group by action on an aliased column (example below)
Does anyone know of a faster decimal implementation in python? As the example below

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.