Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6016695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T03:01:11+00:00 2026-05-23T03:01:11+00:00

In the following, I expect the second find() to succeed, but it does not.

  • 0

In the following, I expect the second find() to succeed, but it does not. Why?

Matcher matcher = 
    Pattern.compile("\\s*asdf").matcher("apple banana cookie");

// returns false as expected
matcher.find();

// resets groups (that weren't being explicitly being used anyway), but not state.
matcher.usePattern(Pattern.compile("\\s*banana")); 

// returns false, expected true.
System.out.println(matcher.find());

If the quantifier is removed from the first regex (becoming simply “asdf”), the second match succeeds. Looking at the Matcher object reveals some kind of group information is stored after the first unsuccessful find(), although I wouldn’t have expected it. Find() is supposed to start either at the beginning (if no previous match) or at the index of the last successful match. UsePattern() is supposed to preserve the Matcher’s position in the input, and discard group information (that, again, I wasn’t using explicitly).

I’m missing something, but I don’t know what. I’m suspecting I have to implement this with lookingAt() and updating the region (such as this example), but I don’t know why this approach isn’t working.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T03:01:12+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:01 am

    Looks like the documentation is a little misleading (or actually, it just doesn’t specify) what the behavior is when you call find() after failure.

    I suppose that the expected usage is that find() is called repeatedly until failure, but never after failure without resetting.

    Looking at the source code confirms that Matcher has an index (the field last) from which it starts searching when doing the next ‘find()’, and when find() fails, that index is advanced to the end and isn’t reset.

    reset() resets that index, usePattern() doesn’t.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

the following code is not behaving like I would expect. Please help me understand
why do the following lines not work as I expect? import numpy as np
someone told me the following table isn't fit for the second database normalization. but
I expect the following code to unload a javascipt jqgrid, then load another grid
I would expect the following code snippet to complain about trying to assign something
I would expect the following code to start my slider at '30' in it's
Boy, this one is really weird. I expect the following code to print 1990,
In the following example should I expect that values.size() will be called every time
The following code prints (when invoking MyMethod): 0 0 0 1 I would expect
I have the following code (ObjA) and it works as I would expect, instance

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.