Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7613939
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T02:16:30+00:00 2026-05-31T02:16:30+00:00

In this case my dynamically loaded DLL is loaded by Windows Explorer in order

  • 0

In this case my dynamically loaded DLL is loaded by Windows Explorer in order to add a new propertysheet (new tab) to the file/folder properties page.

A simple example of this is StrmExt.dll (download source). In this example (source provided by Microsoft) the DLL does NOT use thread local storage (TLS) and therefore causes major problems when loading multiple property pages at the same time.

Upon reviewing the source the DLL required one thread-base variable (the file path of the file)…

static TCHAR g_szFile[MAX_PATH];

Changing this one line of code to:

_declspec (thread) TCHAR g_szFile[MAX_PATH];

… Enabled the DLL to support multiple threads and therefore multiple instances of the propertysheet. However, I knew this change would only be supported by Windows Vista and newer (tests on Windows 7 have been very positive). XP, for example, would not support this for a dynamically loaded library… And it is known to crash the application. (See final paragraph).

In order to run on XP I could not use this declaration. I suspected I needed to enhanced their DLL entry point from:

extern "C"
BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, DWORD dwReason, LPVOID /*lpReserved*/)
{
    if (dwReason == DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH)
    {
        _Module.Init(ObjectMap, hInstance, &LIBID_STRMEXTLib);
        DisableThreadLibraryCalls(hInstance);
    }
    else if (dwReason == DLL_PROCESS_DETACH)
        _Module.Term();
    return TRUE;    // ok
}

…to something like this… As previously seen here

struct ThreadData {
    static TCHAR g_szFile[MAX_PATH];
};
...
DWORD g_dwThreadIndex;

extern "C" BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, 
                      DWORD dwReason, LPVOID /*pReserved*/)
{
    ThreadData* pData;   
    switch (dwReason) {
        case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:

            g_dwThreadIndex = ::TlsAlloc();
            if (g_dwThreadIndex == TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES)
                return FALSE;

           // execute the DLL_THREAD_ATTACH code

        case DLL_THREAD_ATTACH:

            // allocate memory for this thread
            pData = (ThreadData*) ::LocalAlloc(LPTR, sizeof(ThreadData));
            if (pData == 0)
                return FALSE;

            ::TlsSetValue(g_dwThreadIndex, (LPVOID) pData);
            break;

        case DLL_THREAD_DETACH:

            // release memory for this thread
            pData = (ThreadData*) ::TlsGetValue(g_dwThreadIndex);
            if (pData != 0)
                ::LocalFree((HLOCAL) pData);
            break;

        case DLL_PROCESS_DETACH:

            // release memory for this thread
            pData = (ThreadData*) ::TlsGetValue(g_dwThreadIndex);
            if (pData != 0)
                ::LocalFree((HLOCAL) pData);
            // release the TLS index
            ::TlsFree(g_dwThreadIndex);
            break;
    } 
    return TRUE;
}

This works fine during the first load of the DLL whether I create 1 or 2 threads. After the DLL is freed Explorer crashes on the next load of the library.

What am I misunderstanding? I noticed the original developer purposely disabled thread notification upon the DLL process attach notification. Why?

DisableThreadLibraryCalls(hInstance);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T02:16:31+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 2:16 am

    In this case, the problem is best avoided at all. Yes, you’ll probably have more threads than processes, and yes, each property sheet will be associated with only one thread, but the reverse is not guaranteed. Two property sheets may share a single thread, that’s up to the OS.
    (And such undocumented decisions change between versions).

    Instead, use the lParam member of PROPSHEETPAGE. It’s big enough to hold a pointer, also on 64 bits systems. Point that to your own class. Lifetime management is a lot simpler than the DLL attach/detach you were trying; Windows calls your PropSheetPageProc at the right moment.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider this case: dll = LoadDLL() dll->do() ... void do() { char *a =
One could think of this case as follows: The application dynamically loads a module,
Imagine this case where I have an object that I need to check a
In this case the license is question is Apache License v2, but basically if
In this case, the Visual Studio designer generates a method which takes the parameter
In this case, is it bad to subscribe to the proxy CloseCompleted event? public
Consider this case: public Class1 { public static final String ONE = ABC; public
Imagine this case, but with a lot more component buckets and a lot more
In this case, I've developed a CSS code for this web application ..and sometimes
I think in this case there is no need to declare a public constructor

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.