Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 626997
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:28:49+00:00 2026-05-13T19:28:49+00:00

int findLargest (ListNode *p) // ————————————————————————– // Preconditions: list head pointer is passed as

  • 0
int findLargest (ListNode *p)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Preconditions: list head pointer is passed as a parameter.
// Postconditions: returns the largest value in the linked list.
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
    if (p->item != NULL)
    {
        int largest = p->item;
        if (largest > p->next->item)
            ...
    }

    ...
}

Is it possible to write this recursive function passing only a pointer as a parameter? I can’t figure out how to do this without adding more parameters. Any ideas? I am only using sequential search. Nothing fancy.

Here is the portion of class List that will be needed:

    struct ListNode 
    {
        ListItemType item;  // A data item on the list.
        ListNode    *next;  // Pointer to next node
    }; // end ListNode

    ListNode   *head; // Pointer to linked list of items.

I am mainly worried about the feasibility of the problem. Can this be done with only a pointer as a parameter?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:28:49+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:28 pm

    This is definitely feasible, although I agree that recursion is not the best solution to solve this problem. In this case, non-recursive code would be easier to read (recursion), faster (overhead of function call), and more memory efficient (obviously more stack frames).

    Each recursive call returns the greater of either it’s value or the value from the rest of the list.

    int findLargest (ListNode *p) {
        int current = p->item;
        int next;
    
        if (p->next == NULL) {
            //The value at this node is obviously larger than a non-existent value
            return current;
        } else {
            //Recur to find the highest value from the rest of the LinkedList
            next = findLargest(p->next);
        }
    
        //Return the highest value between this node and the end of the list
        if (current > next) {
            return current;
        } else {
            return next;
        }
    }
    

    Recursion stops when the next item is null.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

int lf = ((t.left==null) = (t.right==null)) ? 1:0; it returns 1 if the statement
int (*p)[2]; p=(int(*))malloc(sizeof(int[2])*100); What is the right way to malloc a pointer to an
int ungetc(int c, FILE *fp) pushes the character c back into fp, and returns
int a = 10; int* pA = &a; long long b = 200; long
int main(void) { char testStr[50] = Hello, world!; char revS[50] = testStr; } I
int* p_bob = new int; *p_bob = 78; The above code makes sense to
int x; if (Q()) x = 123; if (R()) Console.WriteLine(x); // illegal int x;
int a[2]; This in memory actually looks like: //Assuming int is 2 bytes add=2000,
int result = 5; result = result--; System.out.println(result); Why is the result equal to
int main() { char *p,c; for(p=Hello World;c=*p;++p) { printf(%c,c); } } In the above

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.