Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 375867
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:32:38+00:00 2026-05-12T14:32:38+00:00

int foo(int n) { int x=2; while (x<n) { x = x*x*x; } return

  • 0
int foo(int n) 
{
    int x=2;
    while (x<n)
    {
        x = x*x*x;
    }

    return x;
}

I need to analyze its time complexity. I noticed it reaches n much faster than just log(n). I mean, it does less steps than O(log(n)) would do. I read the answer but have no idea how they got to it: It is O(log(log(n)). Now, how do you approach such a question?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:32:39+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:32 pm

    Let

    L3 = log to the base 3
    L2 = Log to the base 2

    Then the correct answer is O(L3(L2(n)) and NOT O(L2(L2(n)).

    Start with x = x * 2. x will increase exponentially till it reaches n, thus making the time complexity O(L2(n))

    Now consider x = x * x. x increases faster than the above. In every iteration the value of x jumps to the square of its previous value. Doing some simple math, here is what we get:

    For x = 2
    n = 4, iterations taken = 1
    n = 16, iterations taken = 2
    n = 256, iterations taken = 3
    n = 65536, iterations taken = 4

    Thus, the time complexity is O(L2(L2(n)). You can verify this by putting values above values for n.

    Now coming to your problem, x = x * x * x. This will increase even faster than x = x * x. Here is the table:

    For x = 2
    n = 8, iterations taken = 1
    n = 512, iterations taken = 2
    n = (512*512*512), iterations taken = 3 and so on

    If you look at this carefully, this turns out to be O(L3(L2(n)). L2(n) will get you the power of two, but since you are taking cube of x in every iteration, you will have to take log to the base 3 of it to find out the correct number of iteration taken.

    So I think the correct answer is O(log-to-base-3(log-to-base-2(n))

    Generalizing this, if x = x * x * x * x * .. (k times), then the time complexity is O(log-to-base-k(log-to-base-2(n)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 205k
  • Answers 205k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The InvalidOperationException that you are getting is thrown only when… May 12, 2026 at 8:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Special methods are looked up on the type (e.g., class)… May 12, 2026 at 8:59 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer NOTE: As other have pointed out: you're almost certainly doing… May 12, 2026 at 8:59 pm

Related Questions

class A { public: A(const int n_); A(const A& that_); A& operator=(const A& that_);
class Foo { public: Foo() { do_something = &Foo::func_x; } int (Foo::*do_something)(int); // function
Is there an elegant way to specialize a template based on one of its
In particular, would it be possible to have code similar to this c++ code
I love to organize my code, so ideally I want one class per file

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.