Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 581483
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:35:01+00:00 2026-05-13T14:35:01+00:00

int? x = null; x = x + 1; // Works, but x remains

  • 0
int? x = null;
x = x + 1;  // Works, but x remains null

I would expect the compiler to attempt to cast x as an int, but apparently it does not.

Edit by 280Z28: Changed NullReferenceException to InvalidOperationException, which is what Nullable<T>.Value throws when HasValue is false.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:35:01+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:35 pm

    This is per the specification for lifted binary operators. From §7.2.7:

    For the binary operators

    + - * / % & | ^ << >>

    a lifted form of an operator exists if the operand and result types are all non-nullable value types. The lifted form is constructed by adding a single ? modifier to each operand and result type. The lifted operator produces a null value if one or both operands are null (an exception being the & and | operators of the bool? type, as described in §7.10.3). Otherwise, the lifted operator unwraps the operands, applies the underlying operator, and wraps the result.

    The reasoning is this: you are to think of null for a nullable type as meaning "I do not know what the value is." What is the result of "I don’t know" plus one? "I don’t know." Thus, the result should be null.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 285k
  • Answers 285k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Have a look at this blog here which will help… May 13, 2026 at 4:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I've found a solution ! The problem is self.request.POST dictionnary… May 13, 2026 at 4:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A possible solution would be to check the ChangeSet of… May 13, 2026 at 4:47 pm

Related Questions

So I am trying to learn SDL and creating a small game. When the
So I have been developing a polynomial class where a user inputs: 1x^0 +
I'd like to create my own class extending array of ints. Is that possible?
namespace X{ public static class URLs { public static TabController tabIdLookUp = new TabController();
Basically i don't want to compare elements, but elements that thy contain. It would

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.