Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8497933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T00:15:56+00:00 2026-06-11T00:15:56+00:00

Is it better to do: const int MY_CONST = 20; // global constant in

  • 0

Is it better to do:

const int MY_CONST = 20; // global constant in the program
class A {
    // uses MY_CONST all over the class implementation and definition
}

or this?

const int MY_CONST = 20; // global constant in the program
template<int my_const>
class A {
    //uses my_const only and never MY_CONST
};

//A<MY_CONST> used later in the program

Is one of these pattern better than the other? why?
thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T00:15:58+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 12:15 am

    The second solution is sensible if it makes sense to instantiate e.g. A<MY_CONST + 1>, or A<0>, or any other value than MY_CONST. If, however, A is strictly designed to be used with the one value, then you don’t gain anything from that. In that respect the first solution gives you everything you need.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I always use const T& to pass a class to a function. Like this:
any better way to write this ? $(this).parent().parent().find( dd ul).toggle(); update.. I am trying
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is it better / faster inside an event listener to use this or event.target
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't
I am writing a test program to understand vector 's better. In one of
I think many of you have this kind of code somewhere: int foo; switch
I've been working at this all day so I hope I don't forget any
Consider the following code: class B { int x; public: B() : x( 10
I'm trying to understand better how does const-correctness work and more specifically, when dealing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.