Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7981397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T10:21:27+00:00 2026-06-04T10:21:27+00:00

Is it possible in Haskell to apply the function arrow type constructor (->) to

  • 0

Is it possible in Haskell to apply the function arrow type constructor (->) to only its right-side type (for instance: (-> a)) to get a type constructor of kind * -> *?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T10:21:29+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 10:21 am

    No, it is currently impossible. There are certain limitations to Haskell’s type system that allow it to be useful and convenient for most cases, and this is one of those limitations. Your best alternative is to use a newtype.

    newtype FuncFlip r a = FuncFlip { unFuncFlip :: a -> r }
    

    Newtypes are simply tags to help the compiler know how to typecheck and perform type-directed dispatch (typeclasses) properly. Presumably you wanted to flip the type arguments to provide some typeclass instance. That just means that whenever you want to make use of that typeclass’s functions, you have to decorate any specific inputs with FuncFlip, and undecorate any specific outputs with unFuncFlip. This is slightly more verbose than desired, but it’s not actually that bad, because it forces you to explicitly identify which instance of the typeclass you want to use.

    You can create an instance of Newtype for this, which may or may not turn out to be convenient for you.

    instance Newtype (FuncFlip r a) (a -> r) where
      pack = FuncFlip
      unpack = unFuncFlip
    

    Further reading: Are there “type-level combinatos?”

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to use a Haskell function with the following type :: string ->
In haskell it is posible to partially apply an infix function using sections, for
Is it possible to use Ocaml/Haskell algorithm of type inference to suggest better autocompletions
Possible Duplicate: Java's Interface and Haskell's type class: differences and similarities? When I started
Is it possible to get Haskell Documentation from Terminal or from ghci? In Ruby
When I use putStrLn txt from several threads in Haskell, it's possible to get
Possible Duplicate: Haskell Weird Kinds: Kind of (->) is ?? -> ? -> *
I was wondering, is it possible to integrate haskell's powerful type system into a
Possible Duplicate: Haskell Error: Couldn't match expected type Integer' against inferred type Int' How
Possible Duplicate: How to make a type with restrictions Is it possible in Haskell

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.