Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8793317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T23:06:26+00:00 2026-06-13T23:06:26+00:00

Is it possible to overload the operator new() to have a different return value

  • 0

Is it possible to overload the operator new() to have a different return value than void*?

I have two structures:

One structure (A) just holds data and what not.

The second structure (B) is built to act like a pointer to the first:

struct A;

struct B
{

private:

    A* ptr;

public:

    A& operator*() { return (*ptr); };
    A& operator->() { return (*ptr); };

};


struct A
{
    int data;

    B operator&() { B ret;  ret.ptr = this; return ret; };
};

The idea is as simple as this.
I don’t want any external classes handling pointers to A, not directly.

However, I do want them to be able to create instances of A. Is there a way to override A’s new operator to return an instance of B? Nevermind right now the safety concerns, and handling delete, this is just a simple, reduced example to explain my problem.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T23:06:27+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 11:06 pm

    Operator new is only responsible to allocate memory for the class and then C++ internally call constructor to initialize that memory, so if you want to override something to new A result in a B, then you should override C++!

    Instead you may have:

    struct A {
    private
        friend struct B;
        A() {}
    };
    struct B {
        static B new_A() {return B(new A());}
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Overload ++ operator Say i have a class in which i overloads
Why is it not possible to overload a function just by changing the return
Is it possible to overload the new operator so that an object isn't created,
Possible Duplicate: Operator[][] overload I've looked on the internet but can't find a definitive
Possible Duplicate: Java operator overload In c++, we can perform the operator overloading. But
Is it possible to overload the default function operator (the () operator) in C#?
Possible Duplicate: Can I overload an == operator on an Interface? I do understand
Possible Duplicate: How do I overload the square-bracket operator in C#? For a class
Possible Duplicate: Any reason to overload global new and delete? In c++ you can
Hey. Is it possible to overload operator<< for primitive types? Fx lets say that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.