Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1032043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:01:29+00:00 2026-05-16T14:01:29+00:00

Is it possible to use boost::fusion::invoke function to call a function that has default

  • 0

Is it possible to use boost::fusion::invoke function to call a function that has default arguments without specifying those?

Example:

void foo(int x, int y = 1, int z = 2)
{
  std::cout << "The sum is: " << (x + y + z) << std::endl;
}

...

// This should call foo(0). It doesn't work because the type of foo is void (*) (int, int, int).
boost::fusion::invoke(foo, boost::fusion::vector<int>(0));

// Works
boost::fusion::invoke(foo, boost::fusion::vector<int, int, int>(0, 1, 2));

I am writing a wrapper for bindings to a scripting language and default arguments would greatly improve the intuitive feel for the users of the wrapper. I am afraid though that the standard has not covered this case.

A side note:
I know one could work around it using functors:

struct foo  {
  void operator() (int x, int y = 1, int z = 2)  { /* ... */ }
};

// Works because the functor adds an indirection
boost::fusion::invoke(foo(), boost::fusion::vector<int>(0));

This is however not an option as I don’t want to force the users to create functors just to specify default arguments.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:01:29+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:01 pm

    You can use bind (more info):

    boost::fusion::invoke(boost::bind(foo, _1, 1, 2), boost::fusion::vector<int>(0));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to typedef long types that use templates? For example: template <typename
Is it possible to use JMF in Android? JMF has good functionality? I'm basically
Is it somehow possible to use boost::object_pool<>::construct with non const references? The following snippet
Assume that I have a boost::function of with an arbitrary signature called type CallbackType
It is theoretically possible to use a boost library (e.g. boost threads) inside a
I am using Boost asio 1.48. Is it possible to re-use a single boost::asio::io_service
INFO I'd like to use boost::function to pass callback as parameter, like this way:
Is it possible that nested calls of io_service.run_one() is not a valid use of
I'm using a 3rd party library that passes function pointers to a method call.
I wanted to use boost accumulators to calculate statistics of a variable that is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.