Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9157677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T13:04:57+00:00 2026-06-17T13:04:57+00:00

Is it still worth using static functions in C++ as a helpers? Example: in

  • 0

Is it still worth using static functions in C++ as a helpers?

Example:
in file.cpp

static void helperFunc() { do something }

// class implementation
// ...

// some public method, not static
void myClass::doSomething() { helperFunc(); }

That way I do not have to declare private method in class’s declaration.

Or maybe it is better to use unnamed namespaces and write (in the same file as above)?

namespace {
    void helperFunc() { }
}

What is better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T13:04:58+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 1:04 pm

    Neither of your two examples is better than the other. It’s a matter of style. The static keyword is more expressive. It outright spells out “do not export this name”. Using an anonymous namespace is not that expressive. The fact that the name won’t get exported is a side-effect, not a primary function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been using C++ for some time now and I still don't feel very
Are there any good books on the subject worth reading and still up-to-date with
still a bit of a n00b on SharpSVN, I'm looking to get some simple
Still fighting with templates. In this example, despite the fact that is copied straight
Still quite new to Haskell.. I want to read the contents of a file,
I just wonder a bit whether or not GDI+ is still a technology worth
I'm having some trouble using SML/NJ interactive system, namely, that when I try to
From Gang of Four on the Template Method Pattern: Three implementation issues are worth
I am using SVG-Edit to create a pretty big SVG image file. The problem
I'm currently working on a legacy system using Oracle's ADF Faces JSF implementation for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.