Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8181593
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T00:34:39+00:00 2026-06-07T00:34:39+00:00

Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in

  • 0

Is there a better way to code this?

def __contains__(self, e):
    return e in self.segments or True in [e in x for x in self.segments]

This function should return true if e is in self.segments or if e is in any of the segments in self.segments.

I’m still trying to learn how to use the [a for a in b if c] notations and I’m hoping that someone one StackOverflow can help me simplify that snippet.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T00:34:41+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:34 am
    def __contains__(self, e):
        return e in self.segments or any(e in x for x in self.segments)
    

    any stops on the first element that evaluates to True and, without the square brackets, Python does not create an intermediary list.

    Read about Generator Expressions vs. List Comprehension

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a better way to do this jquery code? Currently I have to
Is there a better way of writing this code? It just doesn't sit right
Is there a better way to write this code? I know it's very simple,
Is there a better way to write this Ruby code? Please help to refactor.
Is that possible to define a function without referencing to self this way? def
This rails validation code is so ugly, and there must be a better way
Normally I use the below code, but is there a better way? lastOfMonth =
Is there a better/shorter way to write the whoAmI method in the following code?
Is there better way to enumerate all photos on the device than this one?
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.