Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 604507
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:02:47+00:00 2026-05-13T17:02:47+00:00

Is there a more elegant way of implementing the following logic in Ruby? a

  • 0

Is there a more elegant way of implementing the following logic in Ruby?

a = nil  #=> obviously 'a' can have value but I am just setting it to nil to make this example clearer
b = a
unless b
  b = "value"
end

Thus, we have the value of b set in the end. We could have another variation of the above code, like so:

a = nil
b = a
b ||= "value"

And I can also use ternary statement to write the above as:

b = a ? a : "value"

But, if you replace variable a and the expression "value" with a long line of code, then a ternary statement starts looking ugly, too.

Can this be made more elegant and expressive somehow, or are we limited to just the above solutions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:02:47+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:02 pm

    You almost answered your question yourself.
    Namely, the two statements

    b = a
    b ||= "value"
    

    can be combined into a single one:

    b = a || "value"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there more elegant way of doing lazy evaluation than the following: pattern='$x and
Is there a more elegant way to write the following Microsoft SQL Server 2008
Is there a more elegant way of doing this sort of thing? I have
Would there a more elegant way of writing the following syntax? Thread t0 =
Is there more elegant way to write the following? try { ... // Some
Is there a more elegant way to accomplish this. I have a string, where
Is there a more elegant way to write the following piece of Python? [foo()
Is there more elegant (less code) way of find a matrix OUT, with colSums(OUT)<=a
I'm wondering if there is a more elegant way to do this: $foo =
I was wondering if there is a more elegant way to do IN() queries

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.