Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6987043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:53:09+00:00 2026-05-27T18:53:09+00:00

Is there a more elegant way to do this? I feel like map should

  • 0

Is there a more elegant way to do this? I feel like “map” should be in there somewhere:

[
    :method_a,
    :method_b,
    :method_c
].each do |method|
    items.each do |item|
        self.send(method, item)
    end
end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:53:09+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:53 pm

    Whether to use map or each depends totally on whether or not you want the operation to return a list of the results of the application of the method (the send) or not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a more elegant/concise way of this; I'd like to get rid of
Is there more elegant way(LINQ or other) to initialize array like this? int[] result
I was wondering if there was a more elegant way than this example to
Is there a more elegant way to write this? try: author = Author.objects.get
I feel a bit silly for this one, but is there a more elegant
Is there a more elegant way to accomplish this. I have a string, where
Is there a more elegant way of writing this function? def reduce(li): result=[0 for
Is there a more elegant way of doing this. I want to replace repeating
Would there a more elegant way of writing the following syntax? Thread t0 =
I was wondering if there is a more elegant way to do IN() queries

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.