Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7638407
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T08:10:11+00:00 2026-05-31T08:10:11+00:00

Is there a (more or less at least) standard int class for c++? If

  • 0

Is there a (more or less at least) standard int class for c++?

If not so, is it planned for say C++13 and if not so, is there any special reasons?

OOP design would benefit from it I guess, like for example it would be nice to have an assignment operator in a custom class that returns an int:

int i=myclass;

and not

int i=myclass.getInt();

OK, there are a lot of examples where it could be useful, why doesn’t it exist (if it doesn’t)?

It is for dead reckoning and other lag-compensating schemes and treating those values as ‘normal’ variables will be nice, hopefully anyway!.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T08:10:13+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 8:10 am

    it would be nice to have an assignment operator in a custom class that returns an int

    You can do that with a conversion operator:

    class myclass {
        int i;
    public:
        myclass() : i(42) {}
    
        // Allows implicit conversion to "int".
        operator int() {return i;}
    };
    
    myclass m;
    int i = m;
    

    You should usually avoid this, as the extra implicit conversions can introduce ambiguities, or hide category errors that would otherwise be caught by the type system. In C++11, you can prevent implicit conversion by declaring the operator explicit; then the class can be used to initialise the target type, but won’t be converted implicitly:

    int i(m);    // OK, explicit conversion
    i = m;       // Error, implicit conversion
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any more generic tools that can compile or basically merge multiple PHP
Is there a more concise/standard idiom (e.g., a JDK method) for piping an input
is there any simple/lightweight solution to change at least some of non-ASCII symbols to
Is there a programming language that is testable by design or at least exhibit
Seriously, there seem to be dozens. Is one more or less canonical? How would
I did some HTTP monitoring with WireShark. Are there more tools like this that
Is there a more efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array, other
Would there a more elegant way of writing the following syntax? Thread t0 =
If there is more than one way, please list them. I only know of
Is there a more efficient way to clamp real numbers than using if statements

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.