Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4568834
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T19:07:58+00:00 2026-05-21T19:07:58+00:00

Is there a more succint way to write this? f(a=a, b=b, c=c, d=d, e=e)

  • 0

Is there a more succint way to write this?

f(a=a, b=b, c=c, d=d, e=e)

Background: I have a function with too many arguments

f(a, b, c, d, e):
    pass

I my program I have local variables that are named exactly same as the function parameters.

a, b, c, d, e = range(5)

I would like to call the function with keyword arguments. Since the variables are named the same, this is how the call would look.

g = f(a=a, b=b, c=c, d=d, e=e) # this can get very long

Of course, I can pass the aruguments using position instead of keywords like this

g = f(a, b, c, d, e) 

But a, b, c, d, e are just the names of variables in this example and it is easy to see the correct order. However unfortunately the variables in my program are named more complicatedly and there is no easily discernible natural order. So I really like to pass them by keyword to avoid any mistakes.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T19:07:58+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 7:07 pm

    You could do something like the following:

    a, b, c, d, e = range(5)
    arg_dict = lambda l: dict((k, globals()[k]) for k in l.split(', '))
    

    arg_dict('a, b, c, d, e') => {'a': 0, 'c': 2, 'b': 1, 'e': 4, 'd': 3}, so you can call your function like this:

    f(**arg_dict('a, b, c, d, e'))
    

    This gives you the ability to specify exactly which variables you want to use. An alternative method for this that does not use globals() would be to use eval(), but it could make the use of the lambda potentially unsafe.

    arg_dict = lambda l: dict(zip(l.split(', '), eval(l)))
    

    If you would prefer to pass locals() in as an argument instead of using globals() in the lambda you can use the following:

    arg_dict = lambda l, d=locals(): dict((k, d[k]) for k in l.split(', '))
    f(**arg_dict('a, b, c, d, e'))
    

    Thanks to senderle for the locals() suggestions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there more elegant way to write the following? try { ... // Some
I was wondering if there is a cleaner (more succinct) way to do what
I did some HTTP monitoring with WireShark. Are there more tools like this that
Is there a more efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array, other
Would there a more elegant way of writing the following syntax? Thread t0 =
If there is more than one way, please list them. I only know of
Is there a more efficient way to clamp real numbers than using if statements
I have writtent some Oracle storedprocedures in these there are more then 20 input
Yes, There's More Than One Way To Do It but there must be a
Is there a more succinct way to define a class in a namespace than

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.