Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8068385
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T12:40:07+00:00 2026-06-05T12:40:07+00:00

Is there a way to avoid/disable keyword expansion in MKS Integrity (2009)? I found

  • 0

Is there a way to avoid/disable keyword expansion in MKS Integrity (2009)?

I found the parameter --unexpand for si ci which seems to have no impact at all.

Then there are the preferences that can be set with si setpreferences. When setting keywordExpand=noexpand for ci my sandbox file does not get changed. But if I create a new sandbox, the keywords are substituted again.

The user manual suggests, the substitution takes places at check-out actually. But then, I wonder why there is a preference keywordExpand for check-in at all. Setting keywordExpand=noexpand for co doesn’t help either.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T12:40:09+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 12:40 pm

    To answer myself: It seems keyword expansion happens on both check-in and check-out. To disable it entirely, the following commands helped:

    si setprefs --command=add keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=annotate keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=ci keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=co keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=resync keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=revert keywordExpand=noexpand
    si setprefs --command=viewrevision keywordExpand=noexpand
    

    Additionally, MKS can/will replace expanded keywords by the raw keywords (unexpansion) which can be disabled with

    si setprefs --command=add unexpandKeywords=false
    si setprefs --command=import unexpandKeywords=false
    si setprefs --command=ci unexpandKeywords=false
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to avoid writing std::vector<int> twice on lines such as these?
Is there a way to avoid the function round() when using Sweave/knitr? It's really
is there any way to avoid using tmp table? I am using a query
is there any way to avoid using tmp table? I am using a query
Is there a way to avoid adding a second LEFT JOIN for the table
Is there any way I can avoid using array_flip to optimize performance. I am
Is there a better way of modeling data in F# to avoid needing it?
Is there a better way in WCF werein we could avoid the translation betwee
is there a way to disable visual basic 10 language features in VS 2010.
Is there a way to avoid the error Null or empty full-text predicate in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.