Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8088431
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T19:05:15+00:00 2026-06-05T19:05:15+00:00

Is there a way to avoid the function round() when using Sweave/knitr? It’s really

  • 0

Is there a way to avoid the function round() when using Sweave/knitr? It’s really annoying to write round(,2) in every \Sexpr{}. I would like to have two decimal places through the whole document.

Thanks for your help
Macs

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T19:05:17+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 7:05 pm

    If you have read the motivation of the knitr package, you probably know I’m the person who hates round() inside \Sexpr{} most. I suggested this to R core long time ago for Sweave but it was ignored, so I started my own package.

    Although the answer by Josh O’Brien is absolutely correct, I should say you really only need options(digits = 2) with knitr, and there is no need to reset the default inline hook because the default hook respects this option.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

is there any way to avoid using tmp table? I am using a query
is there any way to avoid using tmp table? I am using a query
Is there any way I can avoid using array_flip to optimize performance. I am
Is there a way to avoid copying large vectors, when a function expects a
Is there a way to avoid adding a second LEFT JOIN for the table
Is there a better way of modeling data in F# to avoid needing it?
Is there a better way in WCF werein we could avoid the translation betwee
Is there way to animate each letter in a word separately, using only CSS
Whenever I write a function using doubles and integers, I find this problem where
Is there a way to avoid reprocessing forms when I refresh php pages? I'd

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.