Is there any meaning to it?
public static function a(){
static::_b();
}
private static function _b(){
}
static here is same as self in any situation, because you cannot override a private function in the child class, right?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
As Germann Arlington said in the comment. A subclass can have it’s own implementation of _b() – even with a different visibility.
prints
FooEx