Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6132507
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:06:40+00:00 2026-05-23T17:06:40+00:00

Is there any way of keeping a result variable in memory so I don’t

  • 0

Is there any way of keeping a result variable in memory so I don’t have to recalculate it each time I run the beginning of my script?
I am doing a long (5-10 sec) series of the exact operations on a data set (which I am reading from disk) every time I run my script.
This wouldn’t be too much of a problem since I’m pretty good at using the interactive editor to debug my code in between runs; however sometimes the interactive capabilities just don’t cut it.

I know I could write my results to a file on disk, but I’d like to avoid doing so if at all possible. This should be a solution which generates a variable the first time I run the script, and keeps it in memory until the shell itself is closed or until I explicitly tell it to fizzle out. Something like this:

# Check if variable already created this session
in_mem = var_in_memory() # Returns pointer to var, or False if not in memory yet
if not in_mem:
    # Read data set from disk
    with open('mydata', 'r') as in_handle:
        mytext = in_handle.read()
    # Extract relevant results from data set
    mydata = parse_data(mytext)
    result = initial_operations(mydata)
    in_mem = store_persistent(result)

I’ve an inkling that the shelve module might be what I’m looking for here, but looks like in order to open a shelve variable I would have to specify a file name for the persistent object, and so I’m not sure if it’s quite what I’m looking for.

Any tips on getting shelve to do what I want it to do? Any alternative ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:06:41+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:06 pm

    You can achieve something like this using the reload global function to re-execute your main script’s code. You will need to write a wrapper script that imports your main script, asks it for the variable it wants to cache, caches a copy of that within the wrapper script’s module scope, and then when you want (when you hit ENTER on stdin or whatever), it calls reload(yourscriptmodule) but this time passes it the cached object such that yourscript can bypass the expensive computation. Here’s a quick example.

    wrapper.py

    import sys
    import mainscript
    
    part1Cache = None
    if __name__ == "__main__":
        while True:
            if not part1Cache:
                part1Cache = mainscript.part1()
            mainscript.part2(part1Cache)
            print "Press enter to re-run the script, CTRL-C to exit"
            sys.stdin.readline()
            reload(mainscript)
    

    mainscript.py

    def part1():
        print "part1 expensive computation running"
        return "This was expensive to compute"
    
    def part2(value):
        print "part2 running with %s" % value
    

    While wrapper.py is running, you can edit mainscript.py, add new code to the part2 function and be able to run your new code against the pre-computed part1Cache.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way I can run class files (i.e. with main as the
I was wondering that is there any way to run application made in visual
Is there any way to directly pass a variable number of arguments from one
Is there any way to change the BackColor of the border of a panel
Is there any way to view the reduction steps in haskell, i.e trace the
Is there any way to change the icon of an application after it is
Is there any way to validate the contents of a CEdit box without subclassing?
Is there any way that I can create a new delegate type based on
Are there any way to access or set iphone's alarm? Im assuming if this
Is there any way I can add a static extension method to a class.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.