Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 488895
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T01:45:14+00:00 2026-05-13T01:45:14+00:00

Is there going to be much benefit in indexing a boolean field in a

  • 0

Is there going to be much benefit in indexing a boolean field in a database table?

Given a common situation, like "soft-delete" records which are flagged as inactive, and hence most queries include WHERE deleted = 0, would it help to have that field indexed on its own, or should it be combined with the other commonly-searched fields in a different index?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T01:45:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:45 am

    No.

    You index fields that are searched upon and have high selectivity/cardinality. A boolean field’s cardinality is obliterated in nearly any table. If anything it will make your writes slower (by an oh so tiny amount).

    Maybe you would make it the first field in the clustered index if every query took into account soft deletes?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There doesn't seem to be much info on this topic so I'm going to
This is blowing my mind, and there is so much going on that I
Is there going to be a way with the 4.0 SDK to create a
Is there going to be any difference in applying the CSS Media Queries for
I'm sure there's going to be an easy answer for this, but I can't
In my application there are going to be lots of users, over 500. They
I'm using the facedetect example and going from there. Right now it only detects
I assume this just returns an int. Is there anything else going on I
There is some magic going on with WCF deserialization. How does it instantiate an
There is a similar question going around, but it just got the same old

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.