Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9253399
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T11:12:33+00:00 2026-06-18T11:12:33+00:00

Is this a good pattern? BaseClass { protected: Data m_data; public: Interesting public_method() {

  • 0

Is this a good pattern?

BaseClass {
protected:
  Data m_data;
public:
  Interesting public_method() {
    //returns something interesting about m_data
    //what exactly depends on what the subclass put into m_data
  }
}

DerivedClass {
public:
  DerivedClass() { //properly populate m_data }
}

The drawback with this is that things are too “loose” and not compile-time enforced because the subclass programmer is only told to do something, not really forced to do it, so I wonder whether this is considered good practice by seasoned c++ coders.

Any good way out or better ways?

If only the superclass constructor could be forced to be called AFTER the subclass constructor did its work. Then the superclass constructor could have the required parameters in it

c++ does not allow this 🙁

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T11:12:34+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 11:12 am

    If only the superclass constructor could be forced to be called AFTER the subclass constructor did its work. Then the superclass constructor could have the required parameters in it.

    The ctor-initializer-list is quite powerful. Although you can only use expressions, those expressions can include function calls. Virtually anything you can do inside the constructor body can be achieved from inside the initializer list.

    Of course, you must respect construction order, so you can’t call member functions on the base class before initializing it. But you can access the base class when initializing members.

    class BaseClass
    {
      Data m_data;
    protected:
      BaseClass( Data&& data ) m_data(data) {}
    public:
      Interesting public_method() {
        //returns something interesting about m_data
        //what exactly depends on what the subclass put into m_data
      }
    };
    
    class DerivedClass : public BaseClass
    {
      static Data make_arg_into_data( const T& arg ) { /* calculate and return the right value for m_data */ }
      static Interesting make_arg_into_member_init( BaseClass* pThis, const T& arg ) { return pThis->public_method(); }
      V m_member;
    public:
      DerivedClass( T arg ) BaseClass(make_arg_into_data(arg)), m_member(make_arg_into_member_init(this, arg)) {  }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read this good article about Routed Events, and I understood why we need
Is this a good practise,or it just depends? Thanks.
Is this a good pattern? It has a code smell to me with having
is this a good pattern for OO JS? What I am looking for is
I have a button with 3 States Start/Resume/Pause. 1 Is this a good pattern
I am about to build a data access layer the good old ado.net way.
is this good code? can it be simplified somehow? SELECT u.id,u.title,u.title,u.first,u.last FROM (((tblusers u
Is this good OO Design assuming you want every inheriting class to be a
Is this good practice? Storing objects accessed by a constant. There are plenty of
i want to integrate twitter into my iphone application so i read this good

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.