Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 651563
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:10:32+00:00 2026-05-13T22:10:32+00:00

Is this equivalent to a LEFT JOIN ? SELECT DISTINCT a.name, b.name FROM tableA

  • 0

Is this equivalent to a LEFT JOIN?

SELECT DISTINCT a.name, b.name 
  FROM tableA a, 
       (SELECT DISTINCT name FROM tableB) as b

It seems as though there is no link between the two tables.

Is there an easier / more efficient way to write this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:10:32+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:10 pm

    Not, it is equivalent to a cross or cartesian join (really bad) with a distinct applied afterwards. It is pretty hard to know what you really want with the query as it stands.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is this query equivalent to a LEFT OUTER join? //assuming that I have a
I have SELECT clientReport.id FROM clientReport LEFT JOIN report02 ON (report02.id = clientReport.id) WHERE
I am searching for the Linq-to-SQL equivalent to this query: SELECT [cnt]=COUNT(*), [colB]=SUM(colB), [colC]=SUM(colC),
This question is inspired by Jon Skeet's answer: Is there a c# equivalent to
I need the equivalent of this SQL statement in Linq, using method/fluent syntax. SELECT
I came across this interesting behavior. I see left-join is the way to go,
This question follows on from MYSQL join results set wiped results during IN ()
What is the idiomatic Python equivalent of this C/C++ code? void foo() { static
I want to do the equivalent of this: byte[] byteArray; enum commands : byte
What is the Boost::Regex equivalent of this Perl regex for words that end with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.