Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
It seems that on that page TortoiseHg is recommended most for a PC and MacHg is for the Mac. What are some experience of using them if somebody can share?
It seems that Murky for Mac need compilation and sometimes it needs a bit of work. I was also thinking of setting up a virtual machine running Win XP on top of a Mac to use TortoiseHg as well, although that will also need configuring SSH private key as well.
I find that TortoiseHg makes most things really easy once you figure out the interface. For example, creating named branches with TortoiseHg is not obvious but easy to do once you figure it out.
I tried out Murky once, but it is cumbersome and limited.
I like MacHg. It makes doing merges easy since it automatically uses FileMerge on conflicts. However, I find that I need to keep an iTerm window open to do a lot of things with the base hg tool. Stuff like commits are a bit clunky in MacHg.