Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8941149
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T11:14:03+00:00 2026-06-15T11:14:03+00:00

It seems to me that passing extras via Intent calls is a violation of

  • 0

It seems to me that passing extras via Intent calls is a violation of encapsulation, since classes are directly communicating with one another. That being said, the only viable alternative to this that I have found is setting a variable in some shared class and just having each activity pull data from it – part of me, however, can’t help feeling that this isn’t a great design choice either. Can someone shed some light on this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T11:14:04+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:14 am

    Encapsulation, as one of the whale of Object-Oriented paradigm, assumes that you free programmers, who will use your class in future, from the necessity to know how does your component built inside and what complex aspects does it hold, carrying out this information to comfortable and clear programming interface (in the best cases).

    Intent model was developed so, that it assumes interaction between main components of operating system, especially Activitys, and also it assumes that you need to accompany your intents with some concrete information such as kind of ACTIONs you want to perform, a CATEGORY of your intent and some set of DATA that need to implement your intents. So this is convenient model in such kind of interactions.

    At the same time, using some shared class between activities when there is a ready solution for that, is rather irrelevant approach, IMO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It seems that often I find that my code when moving either from one
Seems that This will be an easy question for you but this problem is
Seems that even after unchecking the option in the PyDev/Debug preferenecs pane to launch
It seems that we can show layers and even use a different zPosition for
It seems that runClasses() doesn't terminate the code being tested even after the test
It seems that JavaScript's Date() function can only return local date and time. Is
It seems that it is not advisable to use <meta http-equiv=REFRESH CONTENT=3;url=url> for redirects
It seems that there is a implementation of rope in my /usr/include/c++/4.5.1/ext/rope (and ropeimpl.h
It seems that css animations on firefox are pixelating the edges of elements: Here
It seems that NHibernate Linq doesn't understand grouped .Where method conditions. I got the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.