Question

Lets say I am implementing a calculator which adds two numbers.

Since we want to keep track of the partial result so far, we need to maintain two member variables, oldNum for the partial result, and newNum for the currently entered number.

Now at some point there will be an add method, which adds newNum to oldNum and stores the result in oldNum.

Since both newNum and oldNum are member fields, we don’t need to pass or return anything in the add method.

On the other hand, if you read the source code and you encounter a void method add without any parameters this might look strange.

So my question is whether there are sometimes situations where you want to pass a member field to a member function.

It would look something like:

class Calc {

   int oldNum, newNum;

   public void add1() {
    oldNum = oldNum + newNum;

  }
public int add2(int n1, int n2) {
        return n1 + n2;
 }

Answer 1

There isn’t anything strange about returning void here, you are changing the internal state of the object. You could either return this, void, or a copy of the result of the addition if you wanted to provide an output.

The add2(…) method you wrote doesn’t use any member variables, which should be implemented as a static method, which doesn’t require the object to be instantiated. However, I don’t think you need that here.